Mindfulness Techniques for Letting Go of Control

If there’s anything that’s certain in life, it’s that things will happen that are outside of our control. Sure, we can change our environments to reduce the chances of certain things happening and do our best to prepare for worst-case scenarios, but we can’t predict if (or when) they will happen.

As a result, mindfulness experts and psychologists often tout the benefit of letting go of control and accepting uncertainty. An excessive need to control can lead to unproductive stress, because it often puts people in an extended “fight or flight” mode. Here are 5 mindfulness techniques for letting go of control.

1. IDENTIFY YOUR TRIGGERS

The first step of letting go of control is to identify what triggers your need to control things. Do you find yourself anticipating the reaction of your coworkers who have said hurtful things to you in the past? Does your friend’s success lead you to question your own life and make you stressed out about whether or not you’ll experience something similar in the future? Once you realize what they are, you can start to experiment with methods that prevent you from going down into a worry spiral. One simple method is to take a breath and remind yourself that the need to control doesn’t arise from a true “fight or flight” situation.

2. DO A “MENTAL DUMP” OF YOUR FEELINGS

Sometimes, the need to control is a reaction to unpleasant feelings. Emotions are difficult to regulate, and you might be craving a sense of certainty because you don’t want bad feelings to take over.

But unprocessed and suppressed emotions don’t help you feel a sense of contentment. In fact, they do the opposite by making you more prone to stress, anxiety, and irrational outbursts. One way to process your feelings is to write it all down and do a “mental dump” of what you’re thinking. This can help “get the negativity out of your system”.

3. EMPLOY SOME DISTANCE

Sometimes, your need for control is related to other people’s thoughts and actions. You need to let go of the anger that makes you want to control other people’s actions in the first place. Often, when you’re angry with somebody, you tend to think repeatedly about the thing they did to you, which keeps you emotionally engaged with the way you were wronged. Psychologists call this repetitious thought pattern ‘rumination,’ after the term for how cows chew their cud.”

The best way to deal with rumination is to create some psychological distance. By pushing yourself to see it from the outside, you’ll be coaxing your mind to think of the situation more abstractly. As a result, the specific details of what that person did will be less available to you, and so they’ll have less influence on your emotional state.

4. CHOOSE TO DEAL WITH IT IN THE FUTURE

If your need to control what you know to be irrational worrying, perhaps one of the best ways to deal with it is to dedicate a time in the future to worry about it.

Choosing to dedicate time to “worrying” actually makes you less likely to worry. In turn, it become easier for you to be more at peace with uncertainty and unpredictability.

5. LEARN TO SEE UNCERTAINTY AS A PART OF LIFE

We tend to ask questions and generate “what-ifs” as an attempt to introduce some certainty when we’re uncomfortable with the unknown. But a more mindful way to approach this is to build tolerance for uncertainty. Then, you can slowly identify which of your worries are “useful” and which are making you “unnecessarily miserable.” You can choose to let go of the latter and prepare “strategic solutions” for the former.

Paying With a Credit Card Makes You Spend More Money

1. Sure, using a credit card can be great. You don’t have to carry as much cash around, keeping track of your spending is easier, and credit cards even help you save money. But studies show that cards can also lead you to spend more than you would have with cash.

In 2001, MIT researchers Drazen Prelec and Duncan Simester gave business students a chance to bid on three items: a pair of tickets to a sold-out game between the Boston Celtics and the Miami Heat, a pair of regular-season Red Sox tickets, and a consolation prize of one Celtics and one Red Sox banner. T

2. It turns out that the students were willing to pay 83 percent more on average when paying with a credit card than when paying in cash — and more than twice as much, in some cases. In a second study, simply exposing students to a credit card logo was enough for them to bid more for a gift certificate. That shows that the amount you’re willing to pay in cash isn’t about how much cash you have on hand. There seems to be something intrinsic to credit cards that makes you willing to pay more.

3. Before starting the experiment, the researchers used a sentence-unscrambling task to prime participants to think about either credit cards or cash: Half of them got credit-card words like “Visa,” half got cash words like “ATM.” Next, they saw a picture of a camera, along with a list of details about its benefits and its costs, then they were asked to recall as many of those details as possible. Those primed to think about credit cards made significantly more recall errors about the cost attributes than the cash-primed participants.

Why is this? When you pay with cash, you’re physically giving up a handful of bills, so you’re forced to think about the amount. But it’s all too easy to mindlessly swipe your card when an amount is just a number, and you have until the end of the month to deal with your spending.

China suspends US Navy visits to Hong Kong over support for protests

China has suspended visits by US Navy ships and aircraft to Hong Kong after Washington passed legislation last week backing pro-democracy protesters.

Beijing also unveiled sanctions against a number of US human rights groups.

It comes after President Donald Trump signed the Human Rights and Democracy Act into law.

The act orders an annual review to check if Hong Kong has enough autonomy to justify special trading status with the US.

President Trump is currently seeking a deal with China in order to end a trade war.

What did China say?

 

1. The foreign ministry said it would suspend the reviewing of applications to visit Hong Kong by US military ships and aircraft from Monday – and warned that further action could come.

 

  1. 2.  “We urge the US to correct the mistakes and stop interfering in our internal affairs,” ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying told reporters in Beijing.

“China will take further steps if necessary to uphold Hong Kong’s stability and prosperity and China’s sovereignty.”

 

  1. 3.  Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) targeted by sanctions include Human Rights Watch, Freedom House, the National Endowment for Democracy, the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs and the International Republican Institute.

 

  1. 4.  “They shoulder some responsibility for the chaos in Hong Kong and they should be sanctioned and pay the price,” Ms Hua said, without specifying what form the measures would take.

 

 

 

 

 

What effect will the ban have?

 

  1. 1.  Several US Navy ships usually visit Hong Kong every year, although visits are sometimes suspended when ties between the two countries become strained.The USS Blue Ridge, the amphibious command ship of the US Seventh Fleet, was the last American navy ship to visit Hong Kong, in April.

  1. 2.  Media captionThe identity crisis behind Hong Kong’s protests.Mass protests broke out in the semi-autonomous territory in June and Chinese officials accused foreign governments, including the US, of backing the pro-democracy movement.

  1. 3.  In August China rejected requests for visits by the guided missile cruiser USS Lake Erie and transport ship USS Green Bay, but did not give specific reasons.In September last year, China refused a US warship entry to Hong Kong after the US imposed sanctions over the purchase of Russian fighter aircraft.
  2. 4.  And in 2016, China blocked the nuclear powered aircraft carrier USS John C Stennis, and its escort ships, amid a dispute over China’s military presence in the South China Sea.

Hong Kongers show not only the depths of their discontent, but also their power

Sunday’s vote was framed as a de facto referendum on the protests by all sides. With turnout high from the moment polls opened — and overtaking the 2015 total by midday — many were predicting a win for pro-democracy candidates, but few expected the utter drubbing they delivered.

 

 

  1. The landslide victory for pro-democracy candidates in Sunday’s district council elections is a stinging rebuke to the city’s      government — and an example of what protesters can achieve given the opportunity.
  2. By avoiding unrest and trusting voters to support them, protesters scored a bigger victory than if they had disrupted the polls.
  3. They also demonstrated that far from devolving into anarchy, as some on the government side have claimed, the protest movement can — unlike the police, Beijing or the city’s leaders — control when and where the unrest takes place.
  4. Sunday saw beautiful blue skies, long queues and one of the calmest days in Hong Kong since the protests began in June.
  5.  Far from the visions of destruction and anger that have dominated coverage recently, this was a city that worked. And judging by the results, it worked in spite of, not because of, its government.
  6. According to public broadcaster RTHK, opposition candidates took nearly 90% of the seats up for grabs. Going into Sunday’s elections, all 18 district councils were controlled by pro-Beijing parties.
  7. As counting wrapped up Monday, all but one had flipped to overall pro-democratic control. The only outlier, the Islands council, includes a number of appointed members — even then, pro-democracy candidates took a majority of the elected seats.
  8. In this, the elections were a demonstration of people power in more ways than one. Protesters showed they had the discipline to let people speak, and they were rewarded with a resounding vote of confidence

Xi says HK’s most pressing task is to end violence, chaos and restore order

BRASILIA, Nov. 14 (Xinhua) — Chinese President Xi Jinping said the most pressing task for Hong Kong at present is to bring violence and chaos to an end and restore order.

Xi made this clear stance of the Chinese government on Hong Kong’s situation while he was attending the 11th BRICS summit in Brasilia, capital of Brazil, on Thursday.

Xi said the continuous radical violent activities in Hong Kong seriously trample rule of law and the social order, seriously disturb Hong Kong’s prosperity and stability, and seriously challenge the “one country, two systems” bottom line.

He reiterated that it remains the most pressing task for Hong Kong to bring violence and chaos to an end and restore order.

“We will continue to firmly support the chief executive in leading the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region government to govern in accordance with the law, firmly support the Hong Kong police in strictly enforcing the law, and firmly support the Hong Kong judicial bodies in severely punishing the violent criminals in accordance with the law,” Xi said.

Xi said the Chinese government has unswerving determination to protect national sovereignty, security and development interests, implement “one country, two systems” policy and oppose any external force in interfering in Hong Kong’s affairs.

China Vows Tougher Security in Hong Kong.

Communist Party leaders said they would bring in “national security” legal measures to quell unrest in the territory. The pitfalls could catch them out.

1. BEIJING — Beijing urged Hong Kong’s embattled leader on Wednesday to support a push to impose national security measures in the territory, which has been hit by months of antigovernment protests. The trouble is that what China’s ruling Communist Party has proposed is not clear and could be hard to enforce.

2. The party hopes that such national security measures will head off unrest in Hong Kong that has challenged its authority. But Hong Kong’s politicians have little appetite for security legislation that could set off more intense protests. Many experts also doubt how much Beijing can directly impose its will on the territory’s legal system without dangerously damaging trust in Hong Kong’s special status both there and internationally.

3. China’s latest warning to end the protests that have pummeled Hong Kong for 22 weeks was delivered by Han Zheng, a vice premier who oversees Chinese policy toward the territory, when he met Carrie Lam, Hong Kong’s top official, in Beijing on Wednesday.

4. “This extreme violence and destruction would not be tolerated or accepted by any country or society in the world,” Mr. Han told Mrs. Lam, according to footage of the meeting shown by Phoenix, a Hong Kong-based television service.

What is your opinion on the separatist agenda of the rioters?

Hong Kong is part of China and the rioters have “zero chance of success” of separating the city from its motherland, an economic policy expert says.
“(For) the people who lead these protests, their demands are not the ones that they put forward, and what they really want is the separation of Hong Kong from China,” said John Ross, a senior fellow at the Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies at Renmin University of China, in an interview with China Daily on Thursday.
The rioters are trying to disrupt “one country, two systems”, and they have absolutely no chance of success in achieving their separatist agenda, said Ross, who was born in Britain. He is also a former director of economic and business policy for the mayor of London.
But the danger is that this smaller group of people is manipulating a much larger group, he said, referring to people who have grievances about the city’s social problems.
Ross also noted that there had been foreign interference that complicated the situation in Hong Kong, including from his own country, and also from the United States.
Interference nonsensical
On Thursday, members of Britain’s House of Lords, the upper house of the parliament, debated over the Hong Kong protests and whether to offer United Kingdom citizenship to Hong Kong residents. Hundreds of demonstrators protested outside the British consulate in Hong Kong on Thursday evening.
Ross dismissed the move as nonsense, saying it was just bluff to talk about giving UK citizenship to Hong Kong people. He added that the British government could have given citizenship to all Hong Kong people a long time before 1997. “They didn’t do so because they didn’t want people from Hong Kong (going) to Britain.”
And in the US, Senator Marco Rubio has, among other things, nominated Joshua Wong Chi-fung for the Nobel Peace Prize. Ross cited this as an example of US politicians and government establishment including Congress trying to provide support to anti-government activists in Hong Kong.
America will never allow the separation of any part of it; but they want to separate Hong Kong from China, Ross said, adding the protesters could not to be reasoned with.
Punishment deserved
He said the key task for the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region government is to separate out the small group of people who are very violent and have a political agenda, and deal with them in accordance with the law.
Ross said that in any normal society, if people start using deadly weapons such as Molotov cocktails, they should expect to spend many years in prison.
He said the fundamentals of Hong Kong under the principle of “one country, two systems” will not be damaged by the protests. The city should always focus on the advantages it has as the gateway to China, he added.